In this situation, the patient
is seeking something that will alleviate symptoms and hopefully
resolve the entire disease. However, the patient is normally
facing such issues for the first time and only has one
toe in the water. The patient's view is unique to his or
her own circumstances and does not and can not embrace
that of those who have spent their lives dealing with the
issue from the other side of the desk.
This is important because
the view from one side of the desk is very different from
the other. The practitioner may, for instance, describe
a treatment or protocol. The patient may interpret the
recommendations as an answer to a prayer or a guarantee
of a cure. In the eagerness for relief and rescue, the
patient may not seem to care about the details, details
that include statistics on success rates as well as various
caveats pertaining to the protocol, such as the treatment
is a treatment, not a cure; the treatment has side effects
that may reduce the quality of life; or the treatment is
merely a stop gap measure to be used against a disease
that likely as not will ravage the patient.
If a point in time comes
in which the patient realizes that the protocol is not
saving his or her life, anger towards the practitioner
may mount; but the practitioner is a just another mortal
human being, suffering from the limitations of human existence.
The practitioner does not have magic wands, but even if
he or she did, the most powerful magic wand in the world
could not remove the karma of person with an illness.
Symbolism of the Disease
This is why I always recommend
that patients take the time to understand the broader features
of their illnesses. In the case of cancer, the disease
is not rare. In our lifetime, as many as a third of the
world's population will succumb to cancer. Though there
are several hundred different types of cancer, there are
some features that most cancers share, and there are characteristics
of cancer that are so specific that they make certain diseases
unlikely. For example, people who suffer from acute allergic
symptoms and those who have schizophrenia (except paranoid
schizophrenia) rarely develop cancer. However, people with
eating disorders, alcoholics, and diabetics often develop
cancer. So, some generalizations are possible, but too
many such generalizations detract from the uniqueness of
the cancer experience for each patient suffering from cancer.
I feel that there are common
denominators with each type of cancer, but differences
as well. Therefore, I prefer to look at the symbolism of
the disease for the individual rather than the generic
components of the disease.
No matter how distressed
a patient is, cancer is a disease that, so far as we know,
is not caused by a germ—though this opinion on this
may be changing. We just completed an entire century in
which bacteria
and viruses have been a primary focus of medicine;
but cancer is a disease of internal mechanisms, though
I grant that many of these patterns are responses to external
dynamics. For instance, a person who does not tackle challenges
head on may feel that the issues are stuck inside; and
a person who has been exposed to a specific physical carcinogen
may feel as victimized as one who was psychologically abused
in a relationship. However, without explaining why some
people who are exposed to agent orange or asbestos do not
develop cancer whereas others do, we cannot make any headway
in determining why one individual has a "cancer experience" and
another does not.
Medicine and the New
Millennium
Now we are beginning a new
century and a new millennium, one that is entering on a
wave of excitement over genes and
the potentials of genetic engineering. In this pandemonium,
there is the ever present promise from medicine that miracles
and magic bullets are coming. If this is true, it should
not be permitted to obscure the fact that people are born
with certain characteristics that are deeply embedded in
their DNA. If one is
born with an oncogene, one can pray that it will remain
inactive, held in check by a tumor suppressor gene, or
that brilliant scientists will learn how to remove that
gene before it ushers in disaster.
I may be a bit of a skeptic.
I feel that we are far from perfection and from knowledge
of our covenants with the Cosmos. If our fates can be manipulated
by science, we may become too lazy to figure out our destinies,
in which case, it is a nearly foregone conclusion that
we will not fulfill those destinies.
I therefore prefer not to
lull people into a sense of false complacency. By this,
I mean I do not imply that there are easy answers much
less magic wands that can make all the seemingly bad things
disappear.
I see patients who are so
terrified of disease that the last question they ask is "Why?" It
should be the first question asked since the cure no doubt
lies somewhere very close to the cause. This is the work
I do. As I have said, I am not a doctor. I am of a mystical
bent. I want to know why things happen.
I have never seen illness
as a foe. I have never tried to conquer a disease much
less to fight it. I ask questions so that I can understand
illness and the person who is ill. Yes, in the course of
my studies, I learned quite a bit about the energetics
of healing, including the properties of food
and herbs, but use of these gifts from Nature only
modifies symptoms. In no instance is the underlying pattern
transformed by substances. I believe this is as true of
psychotropic pharmaceuticals as natural remedies. The symptoms
are affected so that people seem to feel different, but
if the props are pulled out, the disease usually returns,
this unless the cause itself is transformed.
Relief and Magic Wands
Patients who are merely seeking
relief tend to be "bad patients" from the practitioners'
perspective. These are the people who believe that a few
years in graduate school turned ordinary people into extraordinary
people who can be blamed for failure even though it is
the patient who was born with the oncogene, the patient
who failed to seek timely help for a lump that had been
growing a long time, the patient who eats pizzas and drinks
alcohol, and the patient who persists in jobs and relationships
that are toxic.
Magic wands are not powerful
enough to save people from themselves. Patients do not
like hearing this; but the truth is, it is empowering for
patients to recognize these facts because it means that
they can change their situations on their own, with or
without the help of those wizards in the white coats who
seem to have so many partial answers but few cures.
We are emerging from an era
of what I sometimes have called "blame medicine" to "karmic medicine." "Blame
medicine" got its momentum from germs
and germ theories that posited that little microorganisms
invade us from outside and cause disease and death. Billions
of dollars of grant money has gone into the war on invisible
creatures, but people are still sick and they still die;
and the superbugs have become more challenging than ever.
"Karmic medicine" is
ancient medicine in a new coat because genes make disease
highly individualistic and take the "blame" away
from the outer and into the inner, where it had been for
eons before Pasteur and Koch and Salk and the others. I
do not believe that karma should imply guilt as
that would, in fact, take us back to the days of the Inquisition
when doctors withheld treatment in order that people could
atone for their sins.